Tucker Carlson’s Limited Hangout and depth of Western gangster Empire

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice. In this post, I will tackle an issue that I’ve touched on before in a previous post, which I’ll mention later. But first, I’d like to start with the definition of a ‘limited hangout’: A limited hangout is a strategic move in the world of espionage, politics, and public relations where a person or organization voluntarily reveals a small part of the truth to prevent the discovery of a much larger, more damaging secret. It’s connected to a quote and the most important lesson from Michael Parenti, which I’ve mentioned in many posts, including the last one — but I don’t want to keep repeating it all the time. It’s about not underestimating people in power, since that tendency is used to manipulate us through our own narcissism and arrogance. They exploit those traits to disguise their malice behind a veil of ambiguity and plausible deniability, convincing people that it’s not malice but stupidity. Sorry — I may be smart, but I’m nobody, with no access to any special information or connections. So if someone like me can figure things out, you won’t convince me that people like Tucker Carlson, whose father was in the CIA and who has extensive connections, don’t understand things that I do. I’m not buying it. You might think, “Oh, I am so brilliant that I am smarter than the most powerful people in the world — people who control and own everything and have access to the most sophisticated information possible.” I, on the other hand, understand that I’m barely grasping what’s going on and trying to make sense of what they’re doing. I’ll quote the main video: 34:03 This is why I—look, again, there’s no way of knowing all the ins and outs of this. We’re outsiders with our noses pressed against the glass. Most people in this space are. Like, we don’t fucking know. What I do know is fucking from Shinola. And when you’re up there lying about knowing about your dad being in the CIA, you were in Nicaragua doing some kind of dodgy work with the Contras during what became the Iran-Contra scandal. And you seem to have a mysterious penchant for backing people who represent agents of what we broadly term the deep state, whatever that is—whether it’s the CIA, whether it’s something deeper than the CIA that goes beyond the CIA, we don’t know. But clearly Tucker is some kind of op who works for somebody because these takes make no sense with his other takes. Like Russell says, “We’re outsiders with our noses pressed against the glass. Most people in this space are. Like, we don’t f**king know… whether it’s the CIA, whether it’s something deeper than the CIA that goes beyond the CIA — we don’t know.” I also don’t know. We’re all outsiders with our noses pressed against the glass. But if outsiders like us can understand certain things, then — sorry — people who are insiders, who had a father in the CIA, who worked with or around the CIA, and who have connections like Tucker Carlson, have to know this stuff too. So yes, in my opinion, Tucker Carlson is some kind of op, like Russell said, and he is doing limited hangouts to manipulate the population. He knows more than he is saying, and he is not saying everything — his omissions are evidence of his manipulation. Now I would like to quote the main fragment from the video that I mentioned. 26:50 Okay, so let me get this straight. Tucker Carlson’s dad was a guy who worked for the CIA in the capacity of using broadcasting to spread deep state propaganda in order to affect desired outcomes and regime changes. That’s what his dad did for a living. Tucker Carlson at the time that his dad was doing this goes to Nicaragua in the middle of the Iran Contra scandal — or it wasn’t a scandal yet but what would become the Iran Contra scandal, the basis of that scandal — he’s going to Nicaragua to give support to a movement that Congress had voted the US cannot get involved in, cannot fund. He’s going down there to support this movement that a rogue element in the government, including the president, is contravening Congress to support, and Tucker Carlson is just, “Yeah, I wanted to support the right side.” Yeah. Yeah. And he was — that wasn’t on behalf of the CIA when his father was working for the CIA? What makes you think he ever stopped working for the CIA? And what makes you think he doesn’t see his job as picking up where his father left off in a new world? Right? This is a world where the podcast—that’s where you want—before it was Fox News was the place where you want to be to spread propaganda. Right now it’s the podcast world. That’s where you want to be to spread propaganda. Too many things he does don’t track. Why does he do things like this Mike Huckabee thing? I don’t know, man. I mean, you know, Caleb Maupin talks about this a lot. He actually — I would love to take a look at this book. Um, what is it? Cowboys versus Yankees or something. He references that a lot in his work. And it’s basically that there are these two wings of the oligarchy at odds. And one would presume that Tucker, given his pedigree, is probably pretty firmly rooted in the old Rockefeller old money base. Um, and you know, the — or as Hedges puts it, right, the corporatists — yeah, they like stability, they like order, they don’t like all this chaos brought about by war and this kind of thing. But it does not track that someone with Carlson’s obvious intelligence, talent, knowledge, grew up in this world, doesn’t get what JD Vance is. There’s no way. There’s no universe where Tucker Carlson does not understand what JD Vance is. I don’t think there’s any universe where Tucker Carlson, when he told you anyone who votes against Tulsi Gabbard is your enemy… I don’t think there’s any world where he didn’t understand what Tulsi Gabbard was. So at that point, you have to ask yourself why. When you look at the fact pattern, this guy is working for the agencies. He’s working for the deep state. And now he may be working for a wing of the deep state that doesn’t like some of the things the administration’s doing, hence the Mike Huckabee thing. Or that could just be a way of getting credibility so that when he tells you JD Vance is the man, you believe him. It could be that. I don’t know. I have no way of knowing that. What I do know from looking at all this is Tucker Carlson is not what he tells you he is. That much we can say with certainty. The rest is speculation. Again, Russell is right when he says, “Tucker Carlson’s dad was a guy who worked for the CIA in the capacity of using broadcasting to spread deep-state propaganda in order to affect desired outcomes and regime changes… And what makes you think he doesn’t see his job as picking up where his father left off in a new world?” Tucker Carlson is simply continuing the work of his father as a mouthpiece of the deep state, trying to manipulate the population. I already wrote a post about it before called: Be aware of false prophets. Here are my thoughts on Tucker Carlson, psyops, media control, cultural hegemony, and the cultural Zeitgeist. Unfortunately, the main video was removed from YouTube because the channel’s author was an antisemite. I don’t agree with the author, but I used his video because he did an even deeper dive into Tucker Carlson. Here is a video I found on Rumble: These are a few reasons why you can’t trust Tucker Carlson▮blackpilled While I don’t agree with the author of the video on many things, he does a much deeper dive into Tucker Carlson and mentions things like a disgraceful article attacking Gary Webb — who, as people who follow my posts know, was one of my heroes a journalists who exposed the CIA’s work with drug dealers to sell cocaine in America for their black budget. Again, Tucker Carlson’s father worked for the CIA, and Tucker Carlson himself vacationed in Nicaragua, working with the Contras — the same Contras that Gary Webb exposed for importing cocaine with the help of the CIA. And this same Tucker Carlson attacked a true truth-teller who exposed all of that. For me, that alone makes Tucker Carlson a piece of shit. So when I hear people glorifying him now, it really frustrates me. Whenever you feel like praising Tucker Carlson, remind yourself that he helped ruin the life of a real hero — a journalist like Gary Webb. Maybe that will make you think twice before praising him. Now I would like to show you another video talking about this topic. It’s from Aaron Good’s American Exception, where they discuss Tucker Carlson’s “limited hangout” regarding September 11 attacks. I’ve written a few posts about 9/11, so people who follow my work know what I think about it. I believe it was a false flag, similar to events like the Gulf of Tonkin lie, the sinking of the RMS Lusitania, and the sinking of the USS Maine. It is literally a copy of how Adolf Hitler burned his own Reichstag and used it to justify the Enabling Act of 1933—extactly how the USA PATRIOT Act was introduced after 9/11. I could write over 100 pages on 9/11 alone, and I don’t want this post to be too long. I’ve mentioned it many times before, so I’ll leave it at that. Here is the video I mentioned earlier: 48:56 You know, everybody wants to talk about how Tucker Carlson’s father was, you know, Voice of America, CIA, whatever, and that Tucker has been part of this milieu. I don’t want to fixate on personalities because I feel that this is more important historically — what is happening. And this empire is collapsing. Part of the way that this is going to unfold is going to revolve around exposures and disclosures of spectacular crimes. So maybe he is a part of a way to slowly roll some of these things out. I want to think that he may be acting in a rational way for actors who are trying to somehow manage what needs to happen here. Potentially, everyone now is so worried about a false flag that perhaps putting these things out is an attempt to dissuade people from doing anything really insane because you’re reminding them of 9/11 and so on. So maybe there is some better thing going on here. But you’re right that there’s so much more that we know about and that has been written about by reliable people, scholars, and then insiders like yourself — the analysis of Peter Dale Scott and Nafeez Ahmed. He’s kind of strange now, but he wrote a lot of pretty solid scholarship on all of this. But we instead get this really limited hangout from Tucker Carlson. It’s baffling, but it’s not surprising. They never talk about these issues. So it’s just difficult to know precisely what to make of it and what it portends. Likewise, I join you on that and I am not reading some sort of major conspiracy or that he’s a front. None of that. Some of the possibilities that come to mind — and I’m not saying these are the reasons — is for example, they haven’t touched upon anyone on that front, you know, our “crap” and what we have been doing against China. That’s not because I’m pro-China, so maybe behind the scenes that part of my case — the part that relates to Tani and East Turkestan and Xinjiang — maybe that part still is the sacred ground that thou shalt not touch upon, and it’s a taboo that nobody is willing to touch. Is that a possibility? I’ll float it out there. People were saying, why in the world was this woman in that FBI for less than a year, yet you go out of your way for back-to-back gag orders? And so much of your testimony isn’t even really mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. Exactly. And then gagging me the second time when the 9/11 family members who were suing Saudi Arabia through the Motley Rice law firm subpoenaed my deposition and testimony. This is when Ashcroft and Mueller came and invoked it for the second time—not because of Saudi Arabia, but because they know the deep state. If one part comes out, inevitably all the other parts are going to come out. That involves the Clinton administration, multiple agencies, NATO, and allied countries. There is still this big issue of China. And again, why does our method have to be terror? Operation Gladio A, the original one, Operation Gladio B — we are the globe’s biggest terrorists. Yes. Well, they can’t go to war with China; they can’t invade China. This seems to be the only way to use violence to destabilize them on behalf of the empire. But what you’re saying about China being the sacred cow is, I think, a part of the story. Additionally, your story touches on the international crime syndicate that has been managed by the West especially since the end of World War II. The global heroin traffic has been dominated by Western actors. That was going to be my second point. We are the biggest drug dealer, the biggest drug lords. And even when we are talking about the nuclear black market and weapons trafficking, we ace on that front. Is that something that makes people so uncomfortable the truth becomes unbearable? Documentation doesn’t matter; most people have a part of them that says, “That makes me feel awful because after all, I’m an American. Every single month I’m paying taxes to this government and I want to stand proud.” Well, at the same time, if we put the facts out there and say it’s not our people but the deep state — our deep state is the global number one terrorist, the drug lord, the weapon trafficking and nuclear black market lord—it just feels yuck. Sometimes populism translates into keeping the issue simple and the sentences short, but sometimes truth is more than that. Yes, it is complex, but it’s all part of this narrative about the US empire since the end of World War II. It entered a new phase with 9/11, but those same dynamics were at play in the JFK assassination. In that case, there were two ways in which the plot was essentially wired for extortion or blackmail. The first was they tried to make the guy look like a communist connected to the Soviets, so they could use the excuse to Earl Warren that we need to cover up any conspiracy to avoid nuclear war. Additionally, Jack Ruby sat at the heart of a network. He was the syndicate man in Dallas, and he had the fix with the authorities for the drugs coming in and out of Dallas. If you looked at him, it would have tracked back to the Teamster corruption, to the national racing wire, and to Las Vegas—to some of the richest and most powerful people in the world connected to the national crime syndicate run by Meyer Lansky, who happens to be an Israeli asset himself. We’re so corrupt that this corruption sort of guarantees its perpetuation because there’s too many old billionaires and oligarchs with everything at stake. They’re going to just keep it rolling, otherwise it would discredit the US as a global leader. It’s like the crime syndicate is the government, and it’s too big to fail Like I mentioned earlier, I agree with Russell Dobular from the Due Dissidence podcast, and unlike Sibel Edmonds, I think Tucker Carlson is a deep-state operative. Now, for people who argue that Tucker Carlson is not a CIA or deep-state operative because he is against war and Israel, I would like to introduce this clip, which I also found through Aaron Good’s American Exception program. This is a clip of Zbigniew Brzezinski, author of The Grand Chessboard. People who follow my posts know very well who he is. He and his book were even mentioned in the earlier video featuring Sibel Edmonds. 27:42 You know, Brzezinski’s grand chessboard; we were not done. We still worked with bin Laden and Zawahiri. This time, it was training and having terror cells created from Chechnya, targeting Russians on Russian soil. It’s the same thing again Anyway, here is the clip in question. Naturally, it was hard to find; I could only track it down in poor quality with a Korean transcript. It’s funny how the clips I use — the ones I think are truly important — are always so difficult to find, usually hidden far, far away in terrible quality. A plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran involves Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks, followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure, then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the United States blamed on Iran culminating in a quote-unquote defensive US military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq Iran Afghanistan and Pakistan In this clip, Zbigniew Brzezinski warns about the possibility of a false flag on American soil that would be blamed on Iran and used to trigger a war. Now, are you going to tell me that a piece of shit like Brzezinski wasn’t part of the Deep State just because he was ‘against’ a specific war or warned us about a possible false flag? We all know he was a central figure in the Deep State. The fact that he said those things doesn’t change his status — and the same logic applies to Tucker Carlson. Just because Tucker says things you agree with or shits on Israel doesn’t mean he isn’t lying to you, and it doesn’t mean he isn’t a Deep State ‘op’ running a limited hangout operation. I may be smart, but I am ultimately a ‘nobody’ with no special access, connections or any special information. Yet, I know and understand so much more about 9/11 than what Tucker Carlson is pushing in his limited hangout — not to mention the outright lies he’s including in it. Do you honestly think a nobody like me knows more about 9/11 than Tucker Carlson does? Either Tucker is a braindead idiot, or he is an evil, lying ‘op.’ Personally, I don’t think he’s stupid — I think he’s EVIL. Now, there is a very famous clip of Tucker Carlson saying this: It is wrong, blasphemous, and sinful for you to suggest, imply, or help others come to the conclusion that the U.S. government killed 3,000 of its own citizens. I was trying to find that clip, but of course, it has vanished from the internet. Interesting, isn’t it? Just as I struggled to find the Brzezinski clips regarding Iran, I now can’t find this famous clip of Tucker Carlson saying this bullshit about 9/11. This is why I hate the modern internet. The old internet — while full of trolls, hateful people, and horrible lies — was still a better place to find real information than this whitewashed bullshit we have today. Anyway, I will end here. I could write much more, and I especially recommend watching the full episode of Aaron Good’s American Exception with Sibel Edmonds. They discuss how we used our ‘McJihadist’ Islamic terrorists in Chechnya to mess with Russia, in Xinjiang with the Uyghurs against China and much more. Sibel Edmonds says: ‘Our Deep State is the global number-one terrorist, the drug lord, the weapons trafficker, and the nuclear black-market lord.’ Once you understand that, you’ll understand why I call the West ‘our Western Capitalist Empire of Evil.’ People claim I’m not being objective for calling the West that — simply for calling evil what it is. But when you realize the West is the world’s leading terrorist, drug lord, and nuclear black-market smuggler — and when you add slave trading and child abuse to that list — you realize that calling it the ‘Empire of Evil’ is actually being generous and tame. “Because Physical Wounds Heal” is a well-known slogan associated with the U.S. Army’s Psychological Operations (PSYOP), reflecting the idea that mental and emotional manipulation can have longer-lasting effects than physical injury   I will end it here, thanks to everyone who stuck with me until the end. And, as always…   “Knowledge will make you be free.” ― Socrates + “Knowledge isn’t free. You have to pay attention.” ― Richard P. Feynman = “Freedom is not free, you need to pay attention.” ― Grzegorz Ochman   “In reality very little was known about the proles. It was not necessary to know much. So long as they continued to work and breed, their other activities were without importance. Left to themselves, like cattle turned loose upon the plains of Argentina, they had reverted to a style of life that appeared to be natural to them, a sort of ancestral pattern. They were born, they grew up in the gutters, they went to work at twelve, they passed through a brief blossoming-period of beauty and sexual desire, they married at twenty, they were middle-aged at thirty, they died, for the most part, at sixty. Heavy physical work, the care of home and children, petty quarrels with neighbours, films, football, beer, and above all, gambling, filled up the horizon of their minds. To keep them in control was not difficult. A few agents of the Thought Police moved always among them, spreading false rumours and marking down and eliminating the few individuals who were judged capable of becoming dangerous; but no attempt was made to indoctrinate them with the ideology of the Party. It was not desirable that the proles should have strong political feelings. All that was required of them was a primitive patriotism which could be appealed to whenever it was necessary to make them accept longer working-hours or shorter rations. And even when they became discontented, as they sometimes did, their discontent led nowhere, because being without general ideas, they could only focus it on petty specific grievances. The larger evils invariably escaped their notice.” ― George Orwell, 1984 Read LaterAdd to FavouritesAdd to CollectionReport The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

View Original Article