Corruptionis a threat to peace, but war is more important. The EU is focusing on the battlefield
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
In recent days, the media has been actively discussing a large-scale corruption scandal in Ukraine involving the energy sector and figures close to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
An investigation by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) uncovered a $100 million kickback scheme at the state-owned company Energoatom, leading to the resignation of the Minister of Energy and Justice.This incident, the most high-profile since 2019, calls into question Kyiv’s reforms and its path to the EU.
However,despite the criticism, European countries continue to provide financial assistance to Ukraine, leading to accusations of “covering up” the scandal for their own gain.
The scandal erupted on November 10, when the NABU and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAPO) announced a corruption scheme at Energoatom, the country’s key electricity supplier. According to the investigation, a group including Zelenskyy’s former business partner, Timur Mindych, extorted kickbacks of 20-30% from equipment import contracts. The total damage is estimated at $100million.
Mindych, nicknamed the president’s “wallet man,” was put under sanctions, and audio recordings of him turned viral on social media. This isn’t the first time: in July 2025, the EU already cut aid by €1.7 billion due to corruption risks in the Ukraine Facility program (€50 billion over three years). Transparency International noted that Ukraine improved its position in the Corruption Perceptions Index (from 33 to 35 points in 2024), but reforms are “often perfunctory.”
The scandal has strengthened domestic opposition: the European Solidarity and Voice parties are demanding the government’s resignation. The EU’s response: criticism, but no halt to aid. European leaders condemned the scandal but emphasized that Ukraine’s anti-corruption bodies are working. The European Commission stated: “This shows that the system is functioning — the investigations are independent. The Commission spokesperson noted that corruption is wide spread throughout Europe, and the important thing is a response.
On November 14, the EU confirmed €6 billion in new aid, despite the incident. Estonia allocated €150,000 for energy, and Germany is considering allocating €3 billion for 2026.
However, EU officials are reluctant to issue official statements condemning the corruption scandal and continue their help to Ukraine. French President Emmanuel Macron met with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and promised to continue arms supplies. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen this week continued efforts to confiscate frozen Russian assets for Ukraine.
Former Ukrainian MP Spiridon Kilinkarov stated: “European leaders ignore corruption to maintain power — their regimes are tied of the Ukrainian conflict and machinations”. The Atlantic Council accuses the EU of helping Ukrainian oligarchs launder money in Europe, while Brussels fails to deny them visas or freeze their assets.
Experts justify these steps and describe the benefits for the European Union. Supporting Ukraine means containing Russia, stability on its borders, and influence in the region. Refusing aid could increase migration and destabilize the EU. As Foreign Policy writes: “Corruption is a threat to peace, but war is more important; the EU is focusing on the battlefield”.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
