Did the Lindsay Clancy Jury Get It Wrong? A Forensic Psychologist Explains

What does it actually mean to be legally insane — and how can a jury determine whether someone experiencing mental illness still knew right from wrong?

On this episode of On The Couch, Dr. Bethany Marshall sits down with forensic psychologist Dr. Ashley to break down the Lindsay Clancy trial, the insanity defense, alleged command hallucinations, psychiatric medications, expert testimony, and the psychology behind the jury’s extraordinary divide.

They examine one of the most difficult questions in forensic psychology: Can someone be deeply mentally ill and still be criminally responsible for their actions?

The conversation also goes inside the psychology of the jury room — from the jurors’ reactions to the attorneys and expert witnesses to the lone holdout juror who refused to change his vote.

For media inquiries or to speak with Dr. Bethany Marshall: media@kaikoa-productions.com

Follow Dr. Bethany on Instagram & Facebook: @DrBethanyMarshall
Follow Dr. Bethany on TikTok: @DrBethanyMarshall

Lindsay Clancy trial, Lindsay Clancy case, postpartum psychosis, postpartum depression, forensic psychology, command hallucinations, insanity defense, criminal responsibility, maternal mental health, forensic psychologist, true crime psychology, Dr. Bethany Marshall, Dr. Susan Ashley, On the Couch
#LindsayClancy #TrueCrime #ForensicPsychology #Psychology #InsanityDefense #MentalHealth #OnTheCouch #DrBethanyMarshall